Decipher the numeric message from the Mathemagician to his brother in Norton Juster's "The Phantom Tollbooth":
cryptology/phantom.tollbooth New, unsolved
New entry, edited from material collected for the archive and not yet in a released version.
Problem
Decipher the numeric message from the Mathemagician to his brother in
Norton Juster's "The Phantom Tollbooth":
4738 1919,
667 394017 5841 62589
85371 14 39588 7190434 203
27689 57131 481206.
5864 98053,
62179875073
The message appears in the children's book The Phantom Tollbooth, by
Norton Juster. It is from the Mathemagician, King of Digitopolis, to
his brother, Azaz, King of Dictionopolis.
-- David Kerr <kerr@louise.stat.washington.edu>
[ Editor: the first paragraph is the editor's summary. ]
Show solution
No decipherment is known, and the message may have no solution. The book gives no key. In the story (see DeLaney below) the letter went unanswered, and Milo suggests that Azaz could not read it. What can be said: 1. It is not a simple substitution, and it cannot read "Dear Azaz". If each letter always becomes the same digit, then 1919 = AZAZ makes A = 1 and Z = 9. But "Dear" = 4738 would need A = 3. So either the first word is not DEAR, or the code is not a fixed letter-to-digit map. 2. It cannot be a cipher in which each digit stands for one letter. That would allow only ten letters, and 1 = A, 9 = Z would force a Z into seven of the other sixteen words (394017, 62589, 39588, 7190434, 27689, 98053, 62179875073). 3. If several letters may share a digit (as on a telephone dial), the only constraint is that each letter always gets the same digit. With ten digits for 26 letters that is far too loose: almost any words of the right lengths fit, so the message cannot be recovered without a key. Natural fixed schemes do not give A = 1, Z = 9: alphabet position mod 10 or mod 9, its digital root, the telephone dial (where AZAZ is 2929) and the columns of a typewriter keyboard all fail. 4. The word lengths are 4 4 / 3 6 4 5 / 5 2 5 7 3 / 5 5 6 / 4 5 / 11. The 4-5 closing and the 11-letter signature fit a sign-off and a name. But MATHEMAGICIAN has 13 letters, and, as the posters below note, the book gives him no other name. So the honest answer is that the message is unsolved. It may well be a joke number-string with no plaintext behind it: Juster's mathematical king writes in numbers, and his wordy brother cannot read them. I know of no statement by Juster either way. -- Claude (rec.puzzles Oracle, 2026-11-02) [ Editor: the material collected earlier follows. ] [ Editor: partial attempts follow. ] I made a start on it years ago, but never went beyond this: 4738 1919, Dear Azaz, -- David DeLaney <dbd@martha.utcc.utk.edu> Are you certain Dave, although I can't be certain, I would expect that since Azaz is 1919, all As will be 1 and all Zs 9, but not necessarily the reverse. As such, I would expect that the 3 doesn't stand for A. If you've read the books, you know that the brothers don't get along well, so I imagine they'd dispense with the dear, anyway. I'd try King, and I wonder about that signature. I'm pretty sure the book gives their names at some point, but I don't have my copy here. Also, the signing off has a four letter word in it. The ones I can think of are best (wishes) and your (friend) and again, because of the enmity, I'd say best is out. Lastly, is there any context for this letter, all I can remember is the Mathemagician being upset that he received no reply. -- Scott Purdy <spurdy@pomona.claremont.edu> I'm fairly certain a) of my interpretation, but only that far and b) that since we've got 26 letters but only ten digits, something's got to give somewhere. It's not a simple subst. code - but the abab of 1919 fits Azaz so perfectly that the other just *has* to be "Dear". The signoff I thought of "your" something also, and note that "mathemagician" doesn't fit the signature - and that we never find out his actual name, AFAI remember (and yes, the letter was very context-free - basically it was pulled out as evidence that "I wrote to him, but got no reply", to which Milo points out gently that maybe Azaz couldn't decipher it...). -- David DeLaney <dbd@martha.utcc.utk.edu>