In general, a [blank]er is someone who [blank]s.
language/english/spelling/operations.on.words/er.reversed New
New entry, edited from material collected for the archive and not yet in a released version.
Problem
In general, a [blank]er is someone who [blank]s. Example: a builder builds, a dancer dances, a player plays. Give an example of a pair of words where this pattern is *reversed*: a [blank] is someone who [blank]ers. -- Jonathan Haas <positron@quip.eecs.umich.edu>
Show solution
Well, I have a few that are probably not what you have in mind, but
here they are:
A moth mothers; a prof proffers; she sheers; a wag wagers.
But all seriousness aside, could your pair be:
A pest pesters?
-- Chris Cole <chris@questrel.com>
In article <2q5d64$7h4@zip.eecs.umich.edu> positron@quip.eecs.umich.edu
(Jonathan Haas) writes:
>Chris Cole <chris@questrel.com> wrote:
>>A pest pesters?
>
>BING! And the Colemeister nails it...
Damn! And here I was thinking that a wave might waver (not quite the
right form, I know) or that a frightened cow might cower.
Congratulations, Chris.
-- Holleman Eric <eric@gsb003.cs.ualberta.ca>
Other answers sent in:
My Cousin, Henry, longs for carnal congress with Gwendolyn. He is
therefore a Hank who hankers.... ...... :-).
-- Ben A. Fairbank <ben@lonestar.utsa.edu>
In order for this to work I must point out that my best friend is
called Matthew and therefore:-
Mat is someone who matters.
I hope there is a financial award...Ta Cheesus. Don't die in the pub
it looks bad.
Also if you have a bat who works in a fish 'n' chip shop, a bat is
someone who batters.
please send your prize to paf2@aber.ac.uk
-- paf2 <paf2@aber.ac.uk>
I think "wimp whimpers" deserves honorable mention. It doesn't quite
go spelling-wise, but it works great vocally (and definitionally).
-- Tom Magliery <mag@cs.uiuc.edu>
Not what you were looking for, but...
"I have a sandwich named after me," boasted Rueben.
"So do I!" COUNTERed the COUNT.
-- Michael P. Chakoian <MPC1@ntrs.com>
Oh, and in answer to the "er" puzzle, my favorite is
A Teet is something that teeters
(yeah, I know the spelling's wrong, but the imagery's worth it).
-- Ben Weber <benw@cbnewsm.cb.att.com>
In article <94123.121728RVESTERM@vma.cc.nd.edu>, <RVESTERM@vma.cc.nd.edu>
writes:
> how about a <blank>erer who <blank>ers?
>
> bob vesterman.
A buggerer who buggers.
-- Michael R. Crystal <MCrystal@bbn.com>
A waterer who waters.
-- Larry Colwell <larryc@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
I know this is an old thread but I was just catching up. How about:
A slob slobbers.
-- Bill Schenck <bschenck@lehman.com>