Shuffle a deck of cards, then deal one card at a time, counting off "Ace, deuce, ...
probability/card/counting.match New
New entry, edited from material collected for the archive and not yet in a released version.
Problem
Shuffle a deck of cards, then deal one card at a time, counting off "Ace, deuce, ... King, Ace, deuce, ..." etc. If you deal a card matching the card you just said, you lose. If you deal out all the cards (without losing, of course) you win. What is the probability of winning? -- James Layland <jlayland@kilroy.Jpl.Nasa.Gov>, December 1993
Show solution
No solution was found in the collected postings. [ Editor: the collected reply corrects a proposed answer but gives no exact value for the 52-card deck. For a single suit (all cards different) see probability/derangement. ] In article <CHpJ7E.HG0@news.chalmers.se> lubin@fy.chalmers.se replies: >For a single suit, that is if each card is uniquely labelled, the >probability of losing on a given card is 1/n. The probability of not >losing on all of them is: > >(1-(1/n))^n which approaches exp(-1)=0.3688 for large n. [ Editor: exp(-1) = 0.3679. ] Try a few small cases: If n = 2, the probability of no match is 1/2 (overall). (1 - (1/n))^n = (1/2)^2 = 1/4, incorrect. If n = 3, there are six possible permutations, of which only two have no match (by inspection). The probability of no match then is 1/3 overall. (1 - (1/n))^n = (2/3)^3 = 8/27, incorrect. The actual probability of not matching exactly on any of n cards is p_n = 1 - 1/1! + 1/2! - 1/3! + - ... +/- 1/n! which is a truncated Taylor series expansion of f(x) = e^x centered at 0 and evaluated at x = -1. For n = 2, p_n = 1 - 1 + 1/2 = 1/2, correct. For n = 3, p_n = 1 - 1 + 1/2 - 1/6 = 1/3, correct. In other words you have the wrong p_n, though it has the right limit. >(1-(s/n))^n > >is exact for a pack of n cards divided into s suits. Test cases: For s = 1, we already found this formula incorrect. For s = 2, n = 4, there are 24 ways to deal 4 cards. By inspection only 4 of these have no matches, so the probability is 1/6. (1 - (s/n))^n = (1/2)^4 = 1/16, incorrect. For s = 4, n = 8, there are 8! = 40320 ways to deal the cards, and only (4!)^2 = 576 have no matches. The probability is 1/70. (1 - (s/n))^n = (1/2)^8 = 1/256, incorrect. The limiting case e(-s) may be correct, I don't know. But I don't think (1 - 1/13)^52 is the exact answer to the original question. -- David A. Karr <karr@cs.cornell.edu> [ Editor: the rest of Dror Lubin's reply, part of which is quoted in the entry above. ] Now if you have s suits, the probability of losing on a SPECIFIC card is s/n. The probability of not losing on all of them is: (1-(s/n))^n which approaches exp(-s) for large n. Substitute s=4, n=52 we find the exact probability: (1-(1/13))^52 = 0.01557, like you have computed empirically. This is slightly smaller than exp(-4)=0.01832 which is the limiting value for 4 suits, many cards in each. In any case, the formula: (1-(s/n))^n is exact for a pack of n cards divided into s suits. -- Dror Lubin <lubin@fy.chalmers.se>, December 1993 [ Editor: the formula is not exact; see David Karr's test cases in the entry above, e.g. s = 2, n = 4 gives 1/6, not (1/2)^4 = 1/16. ]